Enchantment system is rigged!

[Omanty]

I would agree with you there, if weren't for my last enchantment with Guilmon. (lv 9-11 took up 10 BUs)

thanks for backing me up, for some reason it randomly made think of this

it's basicly picking the same card over and over again, because normally the cards change possition, whether it's from fail to succes or succes to fail, it'll most likely turn to success because if you look at how the fail cards are set-up there are usually less fails than success and there's a bit of a pattern(can't exactly remember the pattern ), but in this pattern, the failure card don't appear in the corners very much they rarely appear in the very corners and the very middle, they mostly show up about 1-3 card away from the corners or middle, but the bottom or top, i'm pretty sure that's totally random
i don't know about you guys but it's how i think it works, that and it's just a theory

[TwistedFate]

Two more data finds:

Level 10~11 1/1 success.
Level 7~8 0/2 success.

Also, about there being more in the middle, that's because on the way you're scaling it, there are an uneven amount of cards. There are only 4 corners whereas there are 12 middle cards as you say(1~3 cards away from middle)... So that's skewed a bit.

[Omanty]

Two more data finds:

Level 10~11 1/1 success.
Level 7~8 0/2 success.

Also, about there being more in the middle, that's because on the way you're scaling it, there are an uneven amount of cards. There are only 4 corners whereas there are 12 middle cards as you say(1~3 cards away from middle)... So that's skewed a bit.

i meant in each row

[Relvamon]

Theories are laws that are proven to be true, what you stated is a simple hypothesis which can have 101 methods. I believe Hinaody wants to focus more on statistics here.

Update on 3rd Digimon:

Level 0 - 1: 1/1 Success (Max ) 2.88% (~3% of raw)

Level 1 - 2: 2/2 Success (Max) 5.95% (~6% of raw)

Level 2 - 3: 1/1 Success (Max) 8.84% (~9% of raw)

Level 3 - 4: 3/6 Success (Max) 13.89% (~14% of raw)

Level 4 - 5: 3/6 Success (Maxed at 3rd) 18.95% (~19% of raw)

Level 5 - 6: 2/4 Success (Maxed at 2nd) 23.82% (~24% of raw) [Constant fail, used 1 backup at a time and went opposite]

Level 6 - 7: 2/3 Success (Maxed at 2nd) 33.93% (~34% of raw)

Level 7 - 8: 5/11 Success (Maxed at 5th) 43.86% (~44% of raw) [Used own earned backup]

Level 8 - 9: 1/3 Success (Maxed at 1st) 53.97% (~54% of raw)

Level 9 - 10: 8/40 Success (Maxed at 8th) 68.95% (~69% of raw) [Don't try the Ctrl-trick]

Level 10 - 11: 0/6 Fail, ~78% - ~84%

Level 11 - 12: Not tried, ~93% - ~99

In comparison with my 2nd Digimon, it does prove that enhancement boost and the range offered is based on the percentage of its raw attack it can offer.

Order is 0%, 3%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 19%, 24%, 34%, 44%, 54%, 69%, 84%, 99%. In short, it comprises on 3 sets of 3% (0-3), 3 sets of 5% (4-6), 3 sets of 10% (7-9) and 3 sets of 15% (10-12) to get 99% maximum.

I can prove later that if you miss out on a percentage (Getting 7% instead of 9% bonus on Stage 3), the next boost should still be 5%, so you should only be qualified for 12% max raw on Stage 4.

Another question is if these percentages can be somehow linked to CT and EV to find their own maximum.

[reformed]

For the people that get like 8 fails in a row just stick to the top middle card.

[Relvamon]

EV test

Level 0 - 1: 9/9 Success (Maxed at 9th) [Restarted game after countless 7 'non-max' tries] 8% - 12% of raw

Level 1 - 2: 3/5 Success (Maxed at 5th) 20% - 24% of raw

Level 2 - 3: 2/4 Success (Maxed at 4th) 32% - 36% of raw

Level 3 - 4: 3/15 Fail [Toyed with system such that I got 7 fails in a row with only 2 possible fail cards]

[V Breath Arrow]

EV
Level 0-1: 2/3, failed at first, maxed at second success)
Level 1-2: 3/4, maxed at third success
Level 2-3: 3/3, maxed at third
Level 3-4: 8/10, not maxed yet

[BigTortoise]

Yesterday got my Gabu CT to lv8 to 9 in 4 tries.

The problem is I got Success making the computer decide what card to pick by running out the time...

[Relvamon]

Actually, in accordance to really test just how rigged it is, to avoid any 'special technique' variable of any kind, maybe the best way to test whether if it's rigged or not is to have a sample number of people just letting the timer run down, for the mechanism to do its thing.

[Hinaody]

Actually, in accordance to really test just how rigged it is, to avoid any 'special technique' variable of any kind, maybe the best way to test whether if it's rigged or not is to have a sample number of people just letting the timer run down, for the mechanism to do its thing.

Could be certainly a more objective test, at least perception-wise. However I have the impression it's the same as letting the machine choose for you the lottery number instead of choosing yourself. Not sure if that remove/add any bias.

I'll update the statistics later this weekend.

Thanks all for posting results!